Drawing for LOVED BY NATURE

USPTO serial 78506571

LOVED BY NATURE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
FOSDICK, GEOFFREY A
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with LOVED BY NATURE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mei-lan Stark

MEI-LAN STARK THE WALT DISNEY COMPANY500 S BUENA VISTA STBURBANK, CA 91521-0006UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Articles made from leather and imitations of leather, and not included in other classes, namely, all purpose sport bags, athletic bags, baby backpacks, backpacks, beach bags, book bags, calling card cases, change purses, coin purses, diaper bags, duffel bags, fanny packs, gym bags, handbags, knapsacks, key cases, leather key chains, lipstick holders, luggage, luggage tags, overnight bags, purses, satchels, shopping bags, tote bags waist packs and wallets, umbrellasACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 27, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 27, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 20, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jun 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Jun 16, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jun 2, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
May 27, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
May 26, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
May 25, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
May 17, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
May 17, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 16, 2004CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 15, 2004DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance