USPTO serial 78506711
RAW DAWG
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with RAW DAWG?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
WILLIAM M. CONWAY
WILLIAM M CONWAY PHILLIPS, MOELLER & CONWAY405 W FRANKLIN STTUCSON, AZ 85701-8209UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | AUTOMOBILE ACCESSORIES, NAMELY CAR DEODORANT/CAR DEODORIZER IN VARIOUS SCENTS- NOT FOR PERSONAL USE | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | EYEWARE, NAMELY SUNGLASSES AND SUNGLASS CASES | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | JEWELRY, NAMELY EARRINGS, BRACELETS, NECKLACES, RINGS, PENDANTS, BODY PIERCING RINGS AND STUDS, AND ANKLET BRACELETS | ACTIVE | — |
| 029 | FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY POTATO CHIPS IN ASSORTED FLAVORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | FOOD PRODUCTS, NAMELY PRETZELS; NACHOS; TORTILLA CHIPS WITH CHEESE; PICANTE SAUCES; AND CHEESE SAUCES | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by DAWG HOUSE HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by DAWG HOUSE HOLDINGS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by CYL INVESTMENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 005
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named RAW DAWG
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 7, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jun 28, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jun 11, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 29, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 14, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 2, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 5, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |