Drawing for KOZORU

USPTO serial 78506805

KOZORU

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AYALA, LOURDES
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with KOZORU?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

GREGORY M KRATOFIL JR

GREGORY M KRATOFIL JR POLSINELLI SHALTON WELTE SUELTHAUS PC700 W 47TH ST STE 1000KANSAS CITY, MO 64112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for searching, compiling, indexing and organizing information on computer networks; computer hardware, computer software for searching, compiling, indexing, and organizing information within individual workstations, personal computers, and databases; computer software for answering questions on a variety of subjects presented by users in natural languageACTIVE—
042Computer services, namely, providing non-downloadable software available over a network in order to create a personalized on-line information and answer service; computer services, namely, retrieval of information and answers to a wide variety of questions presented by users in natural language by means of data mining over a global computer network; providing customized on-line web pages featuring user-defined information from searchable indexes and databases of information, including texts, documents, databases, graphics and audio visual information which includes search engines and on-line web links to other web sitesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 19, 2006MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 19, 2006ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 17, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Oct 25, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Oct 5, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Aug 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 25, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jul 6, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jun 28, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 6, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED—
Jun 6, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 3, 2005GEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED—
Jun 3, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED—
Jun 2, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 5, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance