USPTO serial 78506917
GENERAL INSTRUMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GENERAL INSTRUMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Edmund J. Ferdinand, III
Edmund J. Ferdinand, III GRIMES & BATTERSBY, LLP488 MAIN AVENUETHIRD FLOORNORWALK, CT 06851Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 007 | INDUSTRIAL AND WORKSHOP ELECTRONIC MACHINES AND REPLACEMENT PARTS AND FITTINGS THEREFOR, NAMELY, POWER SAWS, POWER DRILLS; DRILLING MACHINES; POWER TAPPING MACHINES; POWER SANDERS, ROUTERS, JOINTERS, NAMELY, PLYWOOD JOINTING MACHINES, PLANERS, LATHES, WAXERS, BUFFERS IN THE NATURE OF FLOOR POLISHING MACHINES, POWER GRINDERS, MILLING MACHINES, BELT AND DISC FINISHING MACHINES, NAMELY, MACHINES UTILIZING ROTATIONAL MOTION FOR HIGH ENERGY SURFACE FINISHING AND MATERIAL TREATMENT, SURFACE GRINDING MACHINES FOR USE IN METALWORKING; ALL FOR AUTOMOTIVE, PLUMBING, CARPENTRY, YARD, WORKSHOP AND INDUSTRIAL USE; AND THERMOELECTRIC GENERATORS | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | TUNERS FOR COMMUNICATION SETS, NAMELY, CAR BROADCASTING TUNERS; UNDERWATER SONAR EQUIPMENT; SEMICONDCUTORS; INTEGRATED CIRCUITS; DISCRETE ELECTRONIC STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS FOR COMPUTERS; RADIO AND TELEVISION STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS; AUTOMATED ELECTRONIC WAGERING SYSTEMS COMPRISED OF RACETRACK TOTALISATOR TERMINALS, RACETRACK TOTALISATORS, TICKET ISSUING MACHINES, OFF-TRACK BETTING TERMINALS AND OFF-TRACK BETTING TOTALISATORS: POINT-OF-SALES SYSTEMS-NAMELY, POINT-OF-SALE TERMINALS AND COMPUTERS FOR USE IN CONJUNCTION WITH POINT-OF-SALE TERMINALS; COMPUTERIZED PAYMENT PROCESSORS; RADAR AND SONAR APPARATUS; TV/FM RECEPTION AIDS MASTER ANTENNA TELEVISION STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS AND CABLE TELEVISION APPARATUS, NAMELY, AUDIOVISUAL RECEIVERS, NAMELY, CENTRAL OFFICE TELEVISION SIGNAL ENCODERS AND CONTROLLERS AND SUBSCRIBER TERMINALS, DECODERS AND CONVERTERS; ANTENNAS; TOWERS AND MOUNTS FOR COMMUNICATIONS SERVERS; CABLE TELEVISION AND MULTIPOINT MICROWAVE DISTRIBUTION EQUIPMENT NAMELY, TRANSMITTERS, SIGNAL SCRAMBLERS, MODULATORS, ADDRESSABLE CONTROLLERS, RECEIVERS, SIGNAL PROCESSORS, SIGNAL COMBINERS/AMPLIFIERS, CONVERTERS, CONVERTER CONTROLS, SATELLITE RECEIVERS AND REMOTE CONTROL UNITS THEREFOR, PAY PER VIEW ORDER RECORDERS, DESCRAMBLERS, COMMUNICATIONS CABLE AND CABLE CONNECTORS, AXIAL LEADED AND SURFACE MOUNT RECTIFIERS, BRIDGES AND TRANSIENT VOLTAGE SUPPRESSORS FOR COMMERCIAL AND MILITARY APPLICATIONS; PACKAGED SATELLITE SYSTEM COMPRISING A RECEIVER, DESCRAMBLER MODULE, SATELLITE DISH ANTENNA AND FEED HORN, DISH ACTUATOR, AND PARTS THEREFOR | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | INSTALLATION AND MAINTENANCE OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS HARDWARE, NAMELY, NETWORK AND TELEVISION SIGNAL ACCESS CONTROLLERS | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by 200 Kelsey Associates, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by 200 Kelsey Associates, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 007
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Similar marks named GENERAL INSTRUMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2010 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 16, 2010 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jan 13, 2010 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 4, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 4, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jul 10, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jul 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jan 16, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 17, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 4, 2007 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 18, 2007 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 30, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 23, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 6, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 1, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 7, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 1, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 6, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |