USPTO serial 78507880
QUALITY-WORKS.NET
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- VANSTON, KATHY
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 105 - DOCKET CLERK
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with QUALITY-WORKS.NET?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Quality-by-Design Software Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Quality-by-Design Software Ltd.
Vancouver, British Columbia, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
George F. Kondor
George F. Kondor Oyen Wiggs Green & Mutala480 - 601 West Cordova StreetVancouver, V6B1G1CANADAGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer software for use by architectural, engineering, design and construction firms to define, analyze and monitor project quality management, quality control and quality assurance in compliance with regulatory and professional requirements and quality assurance standards such as those found in international standards | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Application service provider featuring software for defining requirements, analyzing and monitoring project quality management through quality control and quality assurance methods that follow regulatory and professional requirements and international quality management standards for use by architectural, engineering, design and construction firms; custom design and development of computer software for defining requirements, analyzing and monitoring project quality management through quality control and quality assurance methods that follow regulatory and professional requirements and international quality management standards for use by architectural, engineering, design and construction firms | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality-by-Design Software Ltd.
- Other trademarks owned by Quality-by-Design Software Ltd.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named QUALITY-WORKS.NET
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 1, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| May 7, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Feb 14, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Aug 15, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 23, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| May 3, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 3, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Mar 31, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 27, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Feb 22, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Sep 9, 2005 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 9, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 25, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 22, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 3, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 2, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 7, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |