CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for RTZF

USPTO serial 78508231

RTZF

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3229065Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 17, 2007
Examiner
MAHONEY, PAULA M
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 117

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with RTZF?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Brian Roffe

Brian Roffe Law Office of Brian Roffe9206 Avers AvenueEvanston, IL 60203-1502UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
038Telecommunication services, namely, electronic transmission of voice message and data via components integrated into a motor vehicle, namely, transmitters, receivers, microprocessors, software, cellular phones, and electrical architecture all interacting with global positioning systems using ground-based and/or satellite technology to provide vehicle guidance information to prevent vehicles from contacting other objects such as roadway structures, animals and other vehicles in order to prevent injuries to people, to prevent vehicles from deviating from a roadway in order to prevent injuries to people, and to guide vehicles along roadways to desired destinationsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDJul 19, 2002

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 24, 2017CAEXCANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9—
Jan 22, 2016TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2013NAS8NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - E-MAILED—
Sep 10, 20138.OKREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTEDThe USPTO accepted your Section 8 declaration showing the mark is still in use in commerce (or excusable nonuse). This satisfies the six-year maintenance requirement and keeps the registration active until the next renewal deadline.
Sep 10, 2013APRECASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL—
Aug 30, 20138.AFREGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) FILED—
Aug 30, 2013ES8RTEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED—
May 22, 2012TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Oct 12, 2009TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Apr 17, 2007R.PRREGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTERYour trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive.
Jan 30, 2007PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 10, 2007NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 11, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 11, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 25, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 26, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Oct 23, 2006PGRRPETITION GRANTED - RESPONSE RECEIVED—
Oct 18, 2006APETASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF—
Sep 11, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 11, 2006PETRPETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED—
Sep 11, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 18, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Aug 18, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 20, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 19, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Dec 22, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 15, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 5, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 10, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance