USPTO serial 78509239
SEMPRA
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WEBSTER, WILLIAM M
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with SEMPRA?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SAN DIEGO, CA
SAN DIEGO, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Janet Shih Hajek
Janet Shih Hajek Greenberg TraurigSuite 10002101 L Street, NWWashington, DC 20037Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Business marketing consulting services; energy consumption reducing equipment procurement; and billing services; energy management, control, use and conservation for others, namely, integrated energy management of independently owned heating, cooling, lighting, and electric power generating systems and machinery, namely, turbines, boilers, generators, chilling plants, lighting equipment and associated wiring, conduits and control apparatus for commercial, industrial, governmental and institutional buildings; energy-use management for others in industrial, commercial, governmental and residential facilities | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Consulting services in the field of energy consumption; electrical power monitoring services, namely monitoring industrial, commercial, and household usage of electricity; remote monitoring of energy-related and energy-using equipment; reading of electric and gas meters; and testing of oil, gas, and water pipelines supplying residential, commercial, industrial and governmental buildings and facilities | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 30, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Nov 30, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 5, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Apr 29, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 22, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 21, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Oct 20, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 22, 2008 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Apr 11, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 14, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 14, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 9, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 1, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Apr 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Aug 8, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jul 19, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jun 21, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 19, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Oct 28, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Oct 4, 2005 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jun 16, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 6, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 9, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |