Drawing for ROBOBLAST

USPTO serial 78509250

ROBOBLAST

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
COLEMAN, CIMMERIAN
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 102

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with ROBOBLAST?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Burton S. Ehrlich

BURTON S EHRLICH LADAS & PARRY LLP224 S MICHIGAN AVE STE 1200CHICAGO, IL 60604-2592UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Stationery; paper and paper articles; cardboard and cardboard articles; printed matter, books and printed publications; instructional and teaching material; photographsACTIVE—
028Toys, games and playthings; models and model kits; parts and fittings thereforeACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 8, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 8, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 8, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Jun 7, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 7, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance