Drawing for ELOGICS

USPTO serial 78509290

ELOGICS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ANKRAH, NAAKWAMA S
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 104 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 602: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with ELOGICS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Mark Smith

MARK SMITH STRUCTURE CONSULTING GROUP LLC98 MAIN ST STE 300TIBURON, CA 94920-2517UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
009Computer software for use in the utility, power and energy industry for integrating and interfacing of contracts, counterparties and confirmations related to purchases and sales of energy, ancillary services, capacity physical transmission and congestion hedge for electricity, natural gas, fuel oils and coal commodities that are physical and financial bilaterals, system an regional transmission operators transactions as well as deals consummated on formalized exchanges with the ability to calculate mark to market, display real time position management information and track credit exposure on said deals; Furthermore, the system allows for the scheduling, matching and bookout of power in control areas and regional transmission operators, the checkout of bilateral transactions via a web based and local process, and invoice creation, management and reversalACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB2): The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 17, 2006MAB2ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPONDThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Jan 15, 2006ABN2ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSEThe trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time.
Nov 9, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 13, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 13, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance