CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for INTERCERAMIC BUILDER PLUS

USPTO serial 78509353

INTERCERAMIC BUILDER PLUS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
BRADLEY, EVELYN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with INTERCERAMIC BUILDER PLUS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Felipe Zavala

Felipe Zavala MENDEL BLUMENFELD, LLP5809 ACACIA CIREL PASO, TX 79912-4859UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
035Retail store services featuring floor and wall building products; distributorships in the field of floor and wall building products; retail store services in the field of floor and wall building products featuring a bonus incentive program for customers, namely, builders and building contractorsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jul 28, 2008MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 28, 2008ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jul 24, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
May 9, 2008EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Apr 17, 2008PGEXPETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED—
Apr 7, 2008PETLCOMMUNICATION RECEIVED FROM PETITIONER—
Apr 7, 2008MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Mar 11, 2008PINMINCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED—
Feb 11, 2008TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Feb 11, 2008PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Feb 11, 2008PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Dec 14, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Dec 6, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Nov 16, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
May 17, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
May 16, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Jan 26, 2007EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2007TPEXSOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION—
Jan 10, 2007PETGPETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED—
Jan 10, 2007PROATEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
May 16, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 21, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 1, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 6, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 30, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Dec 28, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 28, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Dec 28, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Dec 28, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Dec 23, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Dec 16, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 6, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 6, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 7, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 7, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 9, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance