USPTO serial 78510325
NINE NAPPY PRODUCTIONS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3703564Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Oct 27, 2009
- Examiner
- GENOVESE, CARRIE A
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with NINE NAPPY PRODUCTIONS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
SACRAMENTO, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA
Sacramento, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA
SACRAMENTO, CA
Sacramento, CA
Carmichael, CA
Carmichael, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 016 | Comic books | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | May 17, 2008 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by MCFARLANE, ADALBERTO, MR.
- Other trademarks owned by MCFARLANE, ADALBERTO, MR.
- Other trademarks owned by Adalberto Vaughn-McFarlane
- Other trademarks owned by MCFARLANE, ADALBERTO, MR.
- Other trademarks owned by MCFARLANE, ADALBERTO, MR.
- Other trademarks owned by Adalberto Vaughn-McFarlane
- Other trademarks owned by Adalberto Vaughn-McFarlane
- Other trademarks owned by Adalberto Vaughn-McFarlane
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Similar marks named NINE NAPPY PRODUCTIONS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Oct 27, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Sep 18, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 13, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 13, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 10, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNEN | NOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2009 | SNEA | SU-EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | GAUN | NOTIFICATION OF NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | GAUD | NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 14, 2009 | NAUD | SU - NOTICE OF UNRESPONSIVE AMENDMENT - WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 22, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 21, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 17, 2009 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 9, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 9, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Dec 24, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 27, 2008 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2008 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 16, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 13, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 12, 2008 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 13, 2008 | PGEX | PETITION GRANTED - EXTENSION REQUEST FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2008 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Feb 1, 2008 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 14, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 6, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Oct 11, 2007 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 12, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 26, 2006 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 11, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 14, 2006 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Mar 14, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 30, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 26, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 25, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 24, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | GRML | CORRESPONDENCE E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 8, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 8, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 10, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |