USPTO serial 78510588
OH BABY!
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DEFORD, JEFFREY S
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with OH BABY!?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Allison Z. Gifford, Esquire
ALLISON Z GIFFORD ESQ DUANE MORRIS LLPUNITED PLZ30 S 17TH STPHILADELPHIA, PA 19103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 002 | Interior and exterior paints | ACTIVE | — |
| 003 | Baby wipes; women's skin care products, namely, soaps, lotions, creams; cosmetics, namely, lipstick, blush, eyeliner; hair care products, namely, shampoo and conditioner; baby skin care products, namely, soaps, lotions, creams; baby hair care products, namely, shampoo and conditioner; body powders, non-medicated diaper rash ointments and creams | ACTIVE | — |
| 009 | Electric switch plates; baby monitors | ACTIVE | — |
| 011 | Lamps | ACTIVE | — |
| 012 | Baby strollers, children's car seats | ACTIVE | — |
| 014 | Clocks | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Posters; art prints | ACTIVE | — |
| 018 | Diaper bags; baby carriers worn on the body | ACTIVE | — |
| 019 | Wood moulding | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Home furnishings, namely, cribs, dressers, changing tables, chairs, armoires, shelves, frames, bassinets, high chairs, non-metal cabinet door catches; window shades for use with automobiles to protect infants and children from direct sunlight | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Curtains; bedding, namely, bed linens, blankets, comforters, bed skirts and pillowcases | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Cloth diapers; infant layette | ACTIVE | — |
| 027 | Wallpaper; rugs | ACTIVE | — |
| 028 | Play yards in the nature of infant and toddler protective confinement fencing systems; infant swings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Cave Springs, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 002
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 011
- Other trademarks in Class 012
- Other trademarks in Class 014
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 018
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 025
- Other trademarks in Class 027
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named OH BABY!
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 17, 2013 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 24, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| May 5, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| May 5, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Nov 10, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 22, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 19, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 18, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |