USPTO serial 78511120
GREEN LIGHT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3587120Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 10, 2009
- Examiner
- PAPPAS, MATTHEW
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with GREEN LIGHT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Maria v. Hardison
Maria v. Hardison Tassan & Hardison4143 27th Street N.Arlington, VA 22207-5211UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Green Light Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Green Light Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Green Light Foods Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Other trademarks in Class 044
- Similar marks named GREEN LIGHT
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2015 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 26, 2010 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 26, 2010 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 10, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 3, 2009 | DP1B | 1(B) BASIS DELETED; PROCEED TO REGISTRATION | — |
| Feb 3, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | D1BR | TEAS DELETE 1(B) BASIS RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 30, 2008 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 7, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 17, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 29, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Aug 27, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 20, 2008 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 19, 2008 | GNRN | NOTIFICATION OF NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2008 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 6, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| May 6, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 6, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNS3 | NOTIFICATION OF LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Apr 22, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 1, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 18, 2007 | ATRV | ATTORNEY REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 19, 2007 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | UNPR | UNRESPONSIVE/DUPLICATE PAPER RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2007 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNS2 | NOTIFICATION OF INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | GNSI | INQUIRY TO SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 2, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Mar 25, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Feb 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 1, 2007 | FAXX | FAX SENT | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 3, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 11, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 5, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 15, 2006 | RCSC | REPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED | — |
| Jun 8, 2006 | PC.D | PETITION TO DIRECTOR DISMISSED | — |
| Jun 1, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| May 8, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | PCRC | PETITION TO DIRECTOR RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 12, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 10, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 10, 2006 | GNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Dec 7, 2004 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2004 | PARI | TEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |