USPTO serial 78511408
LIFE QUEST
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 603
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- TANNER, MICHAEL R
- Law office
- LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with LIFE QUEST?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Kyle L. Elliott
KYLE L ELLIOTT SPENCER FANE BRITT & BROWNE LLP1000 WALNUT ST STE 1400KANSAS CITY, MO 64106UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 045 | Ministerial and pastoral services, namely, providing evangelistic and ministerial services, conducting marriage and funeral services | ACTIVE | Jun 30, 2000 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 24, 2007 | MAB3 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ABN3 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 20, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | RECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 13, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 12, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 18, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 2, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 26, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 25, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 25, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jan 10, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | — |
| Jun 10, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Jun 9, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Apr 14, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 14, 2005 | EAAU | TEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 12, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |