USPTO serial 78513014
FORTUNY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- COWARD, KATHRYN E
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with FORTUNY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark Lerner, Mark Fowler and Veronica Maginnis
Mark Lerner, Mark Fowler and Veronica Maginnis Satterlee Stephens Burke & Burke LLP230 Park AvenueSuite 1130New York, NY 10169Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 020 | Pillows, window shades, fabric window blinds | ACTIVE | — |
| 024 | Bed linens, table linens, table cloths not of paper, fabric table runners, table mats not of paper, sheets, namely, bath sheets, bed sheets, pillow cases, shams, comforters, duvet covers, bed spreads, throws, cushion covers, slip covers, namely, furniture slip covers and upholstery fabrics, quilts, dust ruffles, textile napkins, textile placemats, curtains, window coverings, namely, shades made of fabric; wall hangings made of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
| 035 | Retail store services, mail order catalog services, and online retail store services featuring clothing, namely, skirts, suits, slacks, pants, shorts, skorts, blouses, shirts, blazers, dresses, dusters, cardigans, pullovers, jeans, vests, jackets, sweaters, camisoles, culottes, knit pants, knit tops, tank tops, t-shirts, polo shirts, denim jackets, and jumpsuits, tops, and coats; footwear; ties, scarves, shawls and accessories; and featuring textile fabrics, namely, cotton fabric, woolen fabric, silk cloth, nylon fabric, polyester fabric and fabric combinations of these textile fabrics; and featuring head boards, picture frames, jewelry boxes, upholstered furniture, rugs, house wares, bed linens, table linens, bed and table covers, table cloths, table runners, table mats, sheets, pillows, pillow cases, shams, comforters, duvet covers, bed spreads, throws, slip covers, cushion covers, quilts, dust ruffles, napkins, placemats, window coverings, window shades, fabric blinds, curtains, and wall hangings made of fabric | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Fortuny Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Fortuny Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 024
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Similar marks named FORTUNY
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 20, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Sep 11, 2008 | CORV | REVIEW OF CORRESPONDENCE COMPLETE | — |
| Sep 11, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Mar 12, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Oct 4, 2007 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 26, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 21, 2007 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 27, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 28, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Nov 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 14, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 4, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 29, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 29, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |