USPTO serial 78513431
PARTY PLANNER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Dec 19, 2006
- Examiner
- WHITTAKER BROWN, TRACY
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PARTY PLANNER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Discovery Communications, Inc.
Silver Spring, MD
Discovery Communications, Inc.
Silver Spring, MD
SILVER SPRING, MD
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Anthony Lupo
ANTHONY LUPO ARENT FOX PLLC1050 CONNECTICUT AVE NW STE 400WASHINGTON, DC 20036-5369UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 041 | ENTERTAINMENT SERVICES, NAMELY, DISTRIBUTION OF AN ON-GOING SERIES OF NON-FICTION TELEVISION PROGRAMS IN THE FIELDS OF ENTERTAINMENT, HOME DÉCOR, HOME IMPROVEMENT AND LIFESTYLE; PROVIDING INFORMATION REGARDING HOME DECOR AND HOME IMPROVEMENT TOPICS AS THEY RELATE TO THE TELEVISION PROGRAMS VIA A GLOBAL COMPUTER NETWORK | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Dec 27, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Discovery Communications, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DISCOVERY COMMUNICATIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 041
- Similar marks named PARTY PLANNER
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 26, 2013 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | R.SR | REGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | Your mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application. |
| Nov 13, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 9, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNTA | APPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 3, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Aug 21, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 21, 2006 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 9, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 8, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 12, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |