USPTO serial 78513510
FV FAROTTO VIAGGI ITALY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- MIZELLE HOWARD, DEZMONA JULYE
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FV FAROTTO VIAGGI ITALY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mary Beth Ciocco
MARY BETH CIOCCO MARY BETH CIOCCO LLC22255 CTR RIDGE RD STE 106ROCKY RIVER, OH 44116-3950UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 018 | Backpacks; purses; bags for shopping, made of leather; bags made of leather; belts made of leather; briefcases made of leather; handbags made of leather; leather cloths that cover belts, handbags, purses, bags for shopping, and wallets; briefcases; leather purses; leather cases; leather boxes for holding jewelry and watches; leather shoulder belts; leather straps; leather wallets; luggage tags of leather; key holders made of leather; leather key chains; leather beach bags; leather shoulder belts; briefcases; handbags; key cases of leather; pocket wallets; purses, mobile phone coverings of leather; suitcases; umbrellas; golf umbrellas | ACTIVE | — |
| 025 | Belts, caps, clothing, namely, shirts, pants and dresses, clothing of leather, namely, pants and jackets, footwear, headgear for wear, namely, hats, jackets, jeans, knitwear, namely, sweaters and sweatshirts, pants, shirts, shoes, tee-shirts, suspenders, coats, top coats, corsets, gloves, hats, mittens, outer clothing, namely, coats and jackets, pullovers, sandals, scarves, shorts, slippers, socks, suspenders, sweaters, suits, swimsuits, trousers, casual clothing, namely, shirts and pants, children's clothing, namely, shirts, pants, sweaters, vests, jackets, sportswear, namely, shirts, pants, track pants, namely, t-shirts | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 5, 2007 | MAB0 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Sep 4, 2007 | ABN0 | ABANDONMENT - INCOMPLETE RESPONSE | — |
| Feb 3, 2007 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Feb 3, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 17, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jan 5, 2007 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 12, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 5, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 1, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 30, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Nov 29, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 29, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 7, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 24, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 23, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Dec 29, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |