USPTO serial 78513618
THAT'S CRISPY
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3340964Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Nov 20, 2007
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with THAT'S CRISPY?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
David B. Goldstein
We'll Manage, LLC256 Point of View DrivePrescott, AZ 86303UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | Sweets and confections, namely, brownies and cookies, given as part of an inspirational reward program | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Oct 3, 2006 |
| 045 | Providing a selection of electronic greeting cards and notes via a global computer network for recognition and congratulatory purposes | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Nov 5, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by We'll Manage, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by We'll Manage, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by We'll Manage, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Other trademarks in Class 045
- Similar marks named THAT'S CRISPY
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 17, 2014 | PRAN | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED NO RESPONSE REQUIRED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | NAS8 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 - MAILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2014 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Jul 8, 2014 | XXXX | POST REGISTRATION ACTION CORRECTION | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | PRA8 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 | — |
| Nov 19, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | ES8R | TEAS SECTION 8 RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 20, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Oct 16, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 16, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Sep 17, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Aug 16, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Jan 24, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | TPEX | SOU EXTENSION RECEIVED WITH TEAS PETITION | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| Jan 11, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 27, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| May 13, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 7, 2006 | CHPB | POST PUBLICATION AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 13, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Nov 23, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Oct 21, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 7, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Sep 16, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 12, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 16, 2005 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 5, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| May 5, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |