USPTO serial 78513637
CLEARZAL
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3259984Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jul 10, 2007
- Examiner
- SUAREZ, MARIA VICTORIA
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 102
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with CLEARZAL?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Huntington Beach, CA
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | nail creams, non-medicated foot cream, nail care preparations, body powder, foot powder, and non-medicated skin care preparations for the treatment of plantar warts and corns | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Mar 1, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 18, 2014 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | PR23 | POST REGISTRATION ACTION MAILED - SEC. 8 & 15 | — |
| Apr 18, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 3, 2013 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Feb 28, 2007 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 28, 2007 | ABND | ABANDONMENT DELETED BY TTAB | — |
| Feb 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 18, 2006 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 18, 2006 | OP.S | OPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999 | — |
| Aug 24, 2006 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 25, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 25, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 5, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Mar 4, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 24, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 21, 2006 | ZZZY | PREVIOUS ACTION COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |