USPTO serial 78513757
PETER'S CHOCOLATE THE MARK OF DISTINCTION
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SINGH, TEJBIR
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 106 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PETER'S CHOCOLATE THE MARK OF DISTINCTION?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Ronald E. Hunter
RONALD E HUNTER CARGILL, INCORPORATEDLAW DEPT MS24PO BOX 5624MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55440Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 030 | chocolate, namely, chocolate coatings, drops, chips, and chunks; chocolate mixes; unsweetened baking chocolate; cocoa powders; film coated chocolate drops; film coated confectionery drops; chocolate powders; white, pastel, and cocoa-based confectionery coatings; confectionery chips, drops and chunks for baking; ice cream coatings | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 30, 2005 | CEPE | COMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED | — |
| Jun 30, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | AMPX | PRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED | — |
| Jan 10, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |