USPTO serial 78513809
EVERNEW
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 601
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- RAUEN, JAMES
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with EVERNEW?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Lawrence E. Abelman
LAWRENCE E ABELMAN ABELMAN FRAYNE & SCHWAB666 3RD AVE 10TH FLNEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Track and field event implements, namely, starting blocks for track sports; hurdles for track sports; non-motorized hurdle carts; relay batons for track sports; discuses for field sports; non-motorized discus carriers for field sports; crossbars for field sports; high jump standards; appliances for gymnastics, namely, gymnastic training boxes, gymnastic vaulting take-off boards, and gymnastic balance beams; ball game equipment, namely, net for tennis, volleyball, badminton, table tennis, baseball, soccer, handball, water polo and ice hockey; soccer goals; five-a-side goals; volleyball standards, tennis standard, badminton standards, table-tennis standards, multi-purpose rollaway standards for sports fields for the pole vault and the high jump; line markers for sports fields | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2007 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Dec 22, 2006 | EXFB | EXPARTE APPEAL DISMISSED - FAILURE TO FILE BRIEF | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Dec 4, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 1, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 1, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jul 31, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jul 28, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Jul 28, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Mar 11, 2006 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 30, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 30, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |