USPTO serial 78513920
HARMONICALLY GROWN
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SOMERVILLE, ARETHA CHARESE
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with HARMONICALLY GROWN?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq.
Sherri L. Rohlf, Esq. SIEGEL, BRILL, GREUPNER, DUFFY & FOSTER100 WASHINGTON AVE S STE 1300MINNEAPOLIS, MN 55401-2191UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Hair care products namely, shampoos, conditioners, spray and sculpting gels, hair color, and waving lotions; skin care products, namely, moisturizers, toners, skin cleaning creams, lotion sand bath gels, body and facial lotions, masks and astringents for cosmetic purposes; cosmetics,namely, lipstick, eye shadow, foundation, blush, face powder, concealor, eye pencils, lip pencils and mascara; personal hygiene products, namely, fragrances, essential oils for personal use, skin creams, skin lotions, skin emollients, moisturizing oils and body lotions, perfumes and colognes;and household cleaning products, namely, all purpose cleansers, cleaners for use on dishes,cleaners for use on fabric, and cleansers for use on floors, walls, windows and toilets; essential oils for use as a flavoring, ingredient or filler to be added to foods and beverages, including,without limitation, candy and alcoholic and nonalcoholic beverages, all of which are grown,processed and/or prepared under organic conditions, including no use of herbicides, or pesticides | ACTIVE | — |
| 004 | Candles | ACTIVE | — |
| 032 | Powders, sprays and essences, not in the nature of essential oils, for use in soft drinks and beverages, which are grown, processed and/or prepared under organic conditions, including no use of herbicides or pesticides | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by INTELLIGENT NUTRIENTS, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Intelligent Nutrients, Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 003
- Other trademarks in Class 004
- Other trademarks in Class 032
- Similar marks named HARMONICALLY GROWN
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 13, 2009 | EX5G | SOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 13, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Dec 29, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2008 | EXT5 | SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jun 26, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Feb 8, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Feb 8, 2008 | DPCC | DIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | DRRR | DIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Dec 26, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jun 27, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 15, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Dec 15, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Nov 22, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 27, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Apr 4, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Mar 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Feb 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Feb 10, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Jan 13, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Dec 29, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Dec 21, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 14, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |