USPTO serial 78514246
XKL WORLDWIDE
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- DELANEY, ZHALEH SYBIL
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XKL WORLDWIDE?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 005 | Food Supplements Dietary Food Supplements Vitamin supplements Vitamin and Mineral Supplements ; Food Supplements Dietary Food Supplements Vitamin Supplements Vitamin and Mineral Suppelments; Health food supplement; vitamin preparations; medicine for human use (on pill, powder, liquid or ointment form); fish liver oil, herbal tea; bee pollen, ginseng as health food supplements; medicated plasters; bandages; first-aid boxes (filled); sanitary towels and sanitary pants, sterilizing preparations; all included in Class 5; ; Health food supplement; vitamin preparations; medicine for human use (on pill, powder, liquid or ointment form); fish liver oil, herbal tea; bee pollen, ginseng as health food supplements; medicated plasters; bandages; first-aid boxes (filled); sanitary towels and sanitary pants, sterilizing preparations; all included in Class 5 | ACTIVE | Sep 23, 2002 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 8, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 19, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |