USPTO serial 78514269
XKL SKYFRUIT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 614
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
- Law office
- PETITIONS OFFICE
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with XKL SKYFRUIT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 032 | Fruit Drinks Fruit Juices Concentrates Mineral Water Powders for making fruit drinks Sport Drinks; Non-medicated herbal drinks, non-medicated vegetables juices and drinks, isotonic drinks, nutmeg juices, lemonades and other fruit drinks and fruit juices, beers, mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, syrups and other preparations for making beverage; all included in Class 32; Non-medicated herbal drinks, non-medicated vegetables juices and drinks, isotonic drinks, nutmeg juices, lemonades and other fruit drinks and fruit juices, beers, mineral and aerated waters and other non-alcoholic drinks, syrups and other preparations for making beverage; all included in Class 32 | ACTIVE | Aug 18, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 11, 2006 | PETD | PETITION TO REVIVE-DENIED | — |
| Jun 29, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 9, 2006 | PINM | INCOMPLETE PETITION NOTICE MAILED | — |
| Apr 5, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Feb 27, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 27, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 12, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 12, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 15, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |