USPTO serial 78514772
PERFECT BARRIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 109 - SLIE
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with PERFECT BARRIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Joseph Fischer
JOSEPH FISCHER BEUSSE BROWNLEE WOLTER MORA & MAIRE PA390 N ORANGE AVE STE 2500ORLANDO, FL 32801-1683UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 019 | Water repellant, anti-microbial-supportive film treated lumber, cut timber, composite wood-based sheeting products, fiber-based sheeting products, drywall, and other products for construction made of wood, gypsum and other construction materials; namely, wooden timbers, floor joists, headers, sheathing, subflooring, beams, rafters, studs, trusses, drywall sheeting, drywall panels, drywall boards, plywood, oriented strand board, laminated veneer lumber, particle board, chip board, fiberboard, and other sheeting products for use in floors, walls, ceilings and roofs; lumber, cut timber, wood-based sheeting products, fiber-based sheeting products and gypsum-based products treated with a surface conditioning, priming, water repellant anti-microbial-film, namely, , soffit and fascia, sashes, fencing, trim, girders, columns, flooring, doors, siding, drywall sheeting, drywall panels, drywall boards, plywood, oriented strand board, laminated veneer lumber, particle board, chip board, fiberboard and other sheeting products for use in floors, walls, ceilings and roofs | ACTIVE | Feb 1, 2003 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by WOODSMART SOLUTIONS, INC.
- Other trademarks owned by Woodsmart Solutions, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks owned by Woodsmart Solutions, L.L.C.
- Other trademarks in Class 019
- Similar marks named PERFECT BARRIER
- Prosecution event MAB2 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 21, 2007 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Dec 21, 2007 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 24, 2007 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Apr 23, 2007 | CNRT | SU - NON-FINAL ACTION - WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Mar 24, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Dec 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jun 23, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Dec 27, 2005 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 4, 2005 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 14, 2005 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 12, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 10, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 2, 2005 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 1, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Jul 29, 2005 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |