Drawing for PROGRESSIVE GAMING INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

USPTO serial 78514874

PROGRESSIVE GAMING INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Reg. 3080991Status 710
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Apr 11, 2006
Examiner
GAN, REBECCAH
Law office
PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION

What this means

Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.

Status 710: Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active.

Need help with PROGRESSIVE GAMING INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

SANA HAKIM

SANA HAKIM K&L GATES LLPP.O. BOX 1135CHICAGO, IL 60690-1135UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Printed paper signs used in gaming establishmentsSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 13, 2005
028Gaming tables and card games; Cards or tickets for offering games of chance, namely lottery tickets; Playing cards, namely, cards which contain devices or markings for tracking and identificationSECTION 8 - CANCELLEDSep 13, 2005

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 16, 2012C8..CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR)—
Mar 18, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 11, 2009ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Mar 10, 2009ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Mar 10, 2009REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Sep 17, 2008ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Sep 15, 2008ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 15, 2008REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
May 3, 2006ASCKASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY—
Apr 11, 2006R.SRREGISTERED-SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTERYour mark is registered on the Supplemental Register, which is available for marks that are not yet distinctive enough for the Principal Register but can still identify a source. Protection is more limited than Principal Register registration but can later support a Principal Register application.
Feb 24, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Feb 17, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Feb 11, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 7, 2006XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Feb 6, 2006GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Feb 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Feb 6, 2006ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Feb 6, 2006CNTAAPPROVED FOR REGISTRATION SUPPLEMENTAL REGISTER—
Feb 6, 2006GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 6, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Oct 17, 2005IUAAUSE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED—
Oct 7, 2005AUPCAMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 28, 2005IUAFUSE AMENDMENT FILED—
Sep 28, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Sep 28, 2005EAAUTEAS AMENDMENT OF USE RECEIVED—
Jun 21, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance