Drawing for SOLIDDOCUMENTS

USPTO serial 78514911

SOLIDDOCUMENTS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PEREZ, STEVEN M
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SOLIDDOCUMENTS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lisa Sternoff Feldman

2531 ROYAL CT ESEATTLE, WA 98112UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
042computer software design in the field of file format converter and screen capture utility programsACTIVEApr 30, 2003

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 19, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Dec 19, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Dec 14, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Oct 20, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Oct 20, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Jun 15, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 15, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jun 6, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance