USPTO serial 78514953
SKIN TREATS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- CLARK, ROBERT C
- Law office
- TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with SKIN TREATS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Jess M. Collen
JESS M COLLEN COLLEN IP, INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW, PTHE HOLYOKE-MANHATTAN BLDG 80 SOSSINING, NY 10562UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 003 | Skin care products, namely, creams, gels, powder and milks for cleansing, moisturizing, purifying, rejuvenating, conditioning, toning and care of the face, nose, pores, eyes, skin, body, hands, hair and scalp; cosmetics; cosmetic masks for cleansing, conditioning, toning and firming the face, neck and thighs; body deodorants; perfume, toilet water, toilet soaps, shampoos, lipsticks, lip gloss, lip liners; face wash and body wash; cosmetic preparations for body care, namely, cosmetic preparations for making the lips plumper and fuller; make-up remover, disposable wipes impregnated with cleaning compositions for personal hygiene; cosmetic products, namely, masks, toning and firming creams, milks and lotions for use in cellulite reduction and control programs for the face, neck and thighs; bubble bath; pliable sheet materials and material wraps, namely, flexible materials impregnated or coated with gel, mud or seaweed containing plant extract, mineral extract, kaolin, sandalwood, anmo acids, citric acids, vitamins, enzymes, phyto-hormones and essential oils for wrapping portions of the body for slimming, firming, toning and conditioning purposes | ACTIVE | — |
| 005 | Pre-moisten medicated wipes for human use for cleansing the skin, face, nose, pores, eyes and body and for the treatment and alleviation of the symptoms of acne and other skin affections and impurities; medicated face and body washes | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 25, 2009 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 25, 2009 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 14, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 3, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 3, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jul 2, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Dec 5, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Nov 14, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 9, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 13, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 12, 2007 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 8, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Feb 13, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 19, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 27, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 15, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |