USPTO serial 78515112
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Toronto, Ontario, CA
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Mark I. Feldman
MARK I FELDMAN DLA PIPER RUDNICK GRAY CARY LLPPO BOX 64807CHICAGO, IL 60664-0807UNITED STATES| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Equipment leasing | ACTIVE | — |
| 036 | Business financing services, namely, asset based financing, purchase order financing, lending for industrial, commercial and residential mortgages, issuing of letters of credit, financial services relating to wholesale and retail financing, inventory financing, floor plan financing, revolving credit and loan financing, capital loan financing, equity and acquisition financing, term loan financing, fixed assets financing, real estate financing, retail installment contract financing,conditional sales contract financing, rental lease financing, industrial revenue bond financing, international financing, insurance premium financing, advice relating to investing, credit card services, credit card financing, venture capital financing, import financing, export financing, insurance on receivables, credit consulting; and office and production equipment leasing | ACTIVE | — |
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 28, 2006 | MAB1 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | ABN1 | ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED | — |
| Jun 28, 2006 | EXAR | TEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 20, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 16, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |