Drawing for NATALIE HINDS BY MACY GRAY

USPTO serial 78515331

NATALIE HINDS BY MACY GRAY

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with NATALIE HINDS BY MACY GRAY?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Lawrence E. Apolzon

LAWRENCE E APOLZON FROSS ZELNICK LEHRMAN & ZISSU PC866 UNITED NATIONS PLZNEW YORK, NY 10017-1822UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather goods and accessories, namely, handbags, sports bags, wallets, coin purses, backpacks, shoulder bags, evening bags, credit card cases, cosmetic cases sold empty, toiletry bags sold empty, carry-on cases, clutch purses, business card cases, agenda casesACTIVE—
025Clothing, namely, dresses, skirts, suits, tops, bottoms, blouses, shirts, shorts, sweaters, halter tops, smock tops, jackets, coats, pants, jeans, vests, sweatshirts, sweatpants, jogging suits, ski jackets, lingerie, undergarments, underwear, robes, nightgowns, pajamas, swimwear, bathing suits, cover-ups, stockings, hosiery, socks, tights, leggings, leotards, mufflers, scarves, gloves, ties, belts, shawls, ponchos, shoulder wraps, neckerchiefs, raincoats, rainwear; clothing accessories, namely, belts; headwear, and footwearACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Feb 7, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 7, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jun 6, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Mar 14, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 22, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 1, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 27, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 18, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 11, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 16, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance