USPTO serial 78515789
AD HYBRID
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3644922Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Jun 23, 2009
- Examiner
- ESTRADA, LINDA M
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with AD HYBRID?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Hyogo, JP
Hyogo, JP
GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
SAN DIEGO, CA
Other trademarks owned by GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
SAN DIEGO, CA
Other trademarks owned by GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
SAITAMA-KEN, JP
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Daniel L. Dawes
Daniel L. Dawes Law Offices of Daniel L. Dawes5200 Warner Ave. Ste. 106Huntington Beach, CA 92649UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 028 | Golf clubs | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by SRI Sports Limited
- Other trademarks owned by SRI Sports Limited
- Other trademarks owned by GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GRAPHITE DESIGN INTERNATIONAL INC.
- Other trademarks owned by GRAPHITE DESIGN INC.
- Other trademarks in Class 028
- Similar marks named AD HYBRID
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 29, 2016 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Dec 12, 2012 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 23, 2009 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| May 19, 2009 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 19, 2009 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Apr 24, 2009 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Apr 14, 2009 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2009 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 17, 2009 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Feb 2, 2009 | TMBN | TTAB RELEASE CASE TO TRADEMARKS | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Feb 2, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Jan 21, 2009 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Jun 25, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| Oct 12, 2007 | OPPF | OPPOSITION PAPERS RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Sep 5, 2007 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 22, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 10, 2007 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 18, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Feb 25, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Feb 20, 2007 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 26, 2007 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | GECD | ACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED | — |
| Nov 16, 2006 | CNCF | ACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | JURT | JURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Apr 18, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Apr 18, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Mar 27, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 23, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 20, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Mar 16, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jan 13, 2006 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jan 13, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | LOPT | LETTER OF PROTEST EVIDENCE FORWARDED | — |
| Dec 20, 2005 | PBUR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - MPU REQUEST | — |
| Dec 7, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Oct 28, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 4, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | GPRA | PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CPRA | PRIORITY ACTION WRITTEN | A priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline. |
| Jun 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 17, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |