Drawing for CLOROMEX

USPTO serial 78515805

CLOROMEX

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with CLOROMEX?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

HERBERT DUBNO

HERBERT DUBNO KARL F. ROSS, P.C.5676 RIVERDALE AVENUESUITE 310BRONX, NY 10471-0900

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003LAUNDRY BLEACHABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Aug 7, 2009MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 7, 2009ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
Aug 7, 2009OP.TOPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999—
Aug 7, 2009OP.SOPPOSITION SUSTAINED NO. 999999—
Apr 29, 2009OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Mar 26, 2009ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Mar 3, 2009PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 11, 2009NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jan 26, 2009PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 23, 2009CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 9, 2008RCCKSUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION—
Apr 9, 2008RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 9, 2008ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 9, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 5, 2007RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Apr 3, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Oct 5, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Oct 4, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 2, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Jul 6, 2006RCSCREPORT COMPLETED SUSPENSION CHECK CASE STILL SUSPENDED—
Jul 3, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 3, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jan 6, 2006CNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED—
Jan 6, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Jan 5, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 17, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance