Drawing for XOXO

USPTO serial 78516081

XOXO

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
I, DAVID C
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 114 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with XOXO?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Sophie B. Anger, Esq.

SOPHIE B ANGER TORYS LLP237 PARK AVENEW YORK, NY 10017UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
016Paper goods, namely envelopes, calendars, gift wrapping paper, postcards, writing pads, greeting cards and stationaryACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Dec 17, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Nov 15, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Aug 30, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Apr 5, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Apr 5, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Mar 19, 2007DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 6, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jan 16, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 28, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Nov 28, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Sep 28, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Sep 19, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE—
Sep 18, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED—
Sep 18, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Aug 25, 2006INCDITU OFFICE ACTION ISSUED FOR DIVISIONAL REQUEST—
Aug 24, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Aug 23, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Feb 15, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Feb 15, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 26, 2006TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jan 25, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jun 17, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance