Drawing for PHANTOM

USPTO serial 78516133

PHANTOM

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
KHOURI, SANI PHILIPPE
Law office
TTAB

What this means

These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.

Status 604: These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances.

Need help with PHANTOM?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Michael R. Friscia

Peter E Nussbaum Wolff & Samson PCOne Boland DriveWest Orange, NJ 07052UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
012Motorized scooter vehicles, namely, power wheelchair vehicles for use by handicapped and elderly peopleABANDONED—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2007MAB4ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 8, 2007ABN4ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION—
May 8, 2007OP.DOPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999—
Apr 9, 2007MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Apr 19, 2006OP.IOPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999—
Jan 18, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Dec 20, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 30, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 27, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 21, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Oct 14, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Oct 6, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Sep 26, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 26, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 17, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 12, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance