Drawing for WE HAVE A NEW EXPRESSION FOR REJECTION

USPTO serial 78516404

WE HAVE A NEW EXPRESSION FOR REJECTION

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
JOINER, KATINA JACKSON
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with WE HAVE A NEW EXPRESSION FOR REJECTION?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Rosemary S. Tarlton

ROSEMARY S TARLTON MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP425 MARKET STSAN FRANCISCO, CA 94105-2482UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
005Biological chemical diagnostic test kits for clinical or medical laboratory use, namely, for use in analysis of gene expression, genetics, single nucleotide polymorphism, haplotypes, proteins, and biological samples, for use in detecting diseases, for use in determining the progression of diseases, and for use in determining drug responses; diagnostic medical reagents, chemicals and solid matrix materials for biological, clinical or medical laboratory use for use in diagnosing inflammatory, infectious, central nervous system, cardiovascular, neurological, endocrine, autoimmune and genetic diseases, developmental disorders and cancerACTIVE—
044Medical diagnostic services, namely gene expression testing to determine immune responseACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 8, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 8, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Mar 6, 2007CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED—
Mar 6, 2007COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED—
Sep 5, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Jul 14, 2006ETOPEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED—
Mar 28, 2006ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Feb 28, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Feb 8, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Feb 7, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 17, 2006PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jan 13, 2006ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 9, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED—
Jan 6, 2006CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jan 6, 2006CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Jan 3, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 18, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance