Drawing for SWEET FIRE AND ICE

USPTO serial 78516620

SWEET FIRE AND ICE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
CARROLL, DORITT
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 116 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with SWEET FIRE AND ICE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Len R. Brignac

LEN R BRIGNAC KING, LEBLANC & BLAND PLLC201 ST CHARLES AVE FL 45NEW ORLEANS, LA 70170-1000UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
043Restaurant and bar servicesACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 11, 2007MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
May 11, 2007ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 17, 2007EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 1, 2007EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Nov 17, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT MAILED—
Nov 16, 2006CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Sep 18, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 7, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 7, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 21, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 19, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 19, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 20, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance