USPTO serial 78516950
DEAD ON DEMAND
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- SAKAI, ADA HAN
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with DEAD ON DEMAND?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Gabrielle S. Roth
Gabrielle S. Roth Dickstein Shapiro LLP1825 Eye Street, NWWashington, DC 20006-5403UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 009 | Computer hardware featuring a system for causing the destruction of data stored on electronic data storage devices by dispensing a chemical reactant to the data storage media of the devices | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Data destruction services for remotely causing the destruction of electronically stored data for others | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Ensconce Data Technology, LLC.
- Other trademarks owned by Ensconce Data Technology, LLC.
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named DEAD ON DEMAND
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 24, 2009 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Aug 24, 2009 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Jan 26, 2009 | EX4G | SOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EXT4 | SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 18, 2008 | EX3G | SOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 18, 2008 | AITU | CASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EXT3 | SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED | — |
| Jul 9, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 30, 2008 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Jan 8, 2008 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Jul 23, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Jan 23, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Oct 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Oct 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Sep 15, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Sep 12, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Aug 30, 2006 | ZZZX | PREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN | — |
| Aug 26, 2006 | PBCR | WITHDRAWN FROM PUB - OG REVIEW QUERY | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jul 25, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jun 22, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jun 17, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| May 11, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| May 11, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 14, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 14, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Nov 2, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 20, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Oct 18, 2005 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 18, 2005 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 11, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |