USPTO serial 78517035
YOGHURT TOPPS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- KIM, YONG OH
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 115 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with YOGHURT TOPPS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Owner
Goodman Fielder Consumer Foods Pty Limited
Macquarie Park, AU
Other trademarks owned by Goodman Fielder Consumer Foods Pty Limited
THE UNCLE TOBYS COMPANY PTY LIMITED
MACQUARIE PARK, NEW SOUTH WALES, AU
Other trademarks owned by THE UNCLE TOBYS COMPANY PTY LIMITED
SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
VEVEY, CANTON VAUD, CH
Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 029 | Dehydrated fruit snacks; dehydrated fruit snacks containing gummy confections; fruit based snack foods; fruit substitute based snack foods containing fruit pulp and fruit paste; snack foods; processed nut-based snacks; fruit and processed nut-based snack foods; snack mix consisting primarily of processed fruits and/or processed nuts; dried fruit snacks; potato crisps and chips; cheese dips and cheese snacks made of cheese; candied nuts; dips; spreads, namely fruit-based spreads, vegetable-based spreads, meat-based spreads and cheese-based spreads. | ACTIVE | — |
| 030 | Cereal based snack foods containing vegetables; cereal based-snack foods including granola-based snack bars, rice-based snack foods and wheat-based snack foods; ready to eat cereal-derived food bars; muesli; muesli bars; extruded snack foods, namely, corn snacks, corn chips and rice snacks; biscuits and cookies; crackers; pretzels; popped popcorn; microwave popcorn; popcorn bars; sauces; salsas. | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Goodman Fielder Consumer Foods Pty Limited
- Other trademarks owned by THE UNCLE TOBYS COMPANY PTY LIMITED
- Other trademarks owned by SOCIETE DES PRODUITS NESTLE S.A.
- Other trademarks in Class 029
- Other trademarks in Class 030
- Similar marks named YOGHURT TOPPS
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 13, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 28, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Sep 27, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Apr 12, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | WOAG | WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY GRANTED | — |
| Mar 1, 2006 | WOAR | TEAS WITHDRAWAL OF ATTORNEY RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 14, 2006 | GNFR | FINAL REFUSAL E-MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 14, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 5, 2006 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 23, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 26, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 26, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 20, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 19, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |