Drawing for HURRICANE

USPTO serial 78517401

HURRICANE

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
NADELMAN, ANDREA KOYNER
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with HURRICANE?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Adrienne L. White

ADRIENNE L WHITE WHITE, REDWAY & BROWN LLP1217 KING STALEXANDRIA, VA 22314UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
007machines, namely, crushers for crushing rocks and parts therefor; machine parts, namely, feeders for use together with above mentioned crushersACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Sep 26, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Sep 26, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Sep 25, 2006EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Aug 4, 2006GNSLLETTER OF SUSPENSION E-MAILED—
Aug 4, 2006CNSLSUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN—
Aug 4, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jul 18, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jul 18, 2006TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jan 23, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 23, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 3, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 22, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 22, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 22, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 22, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Dec 15, 2004AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Dec 15, 2004PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance