CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for MINGLEMIND

USPTO serial 78517551

MINGLEMIND

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
AGOSTO, GISELLE MARIE
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MINGLEMIND?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

David J. Schuman, Esq.

DAVID J SCHUMAN ESQ CHURCH & DWIGHT CO INC469 N HARRISON STPRINCETON, NJ 08543UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003Cleaning products for household use, namely all-purpose cleaning preparations, shower, tub and tile cleaners, carpet cleaning preparations, cleaning preparations for garage floors, and laundry preparations, namely, laundry detergent, laundry additives, namely, stain removers; hair and body care products, namely, hand soap, lotions and aromatherapy products namely, oils, lotions, creamsACTIVE—
004CandlesACTIVE—
005Air fresheners and deodorizersACTIVE—
035Online retail store services featuring household cleaning products, personal care products and aromatherapy productsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 3, 2007MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 3, 2007ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Sep 17, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Aug 21, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Aug 21, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 21, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 21, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Aug 16, 2006ASGNAUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP—
Feb 28, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Dec 6, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Nov 16, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Oct 13, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Oct 11, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Sep 30, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Sep 30, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED—
Sep 29, 2005GNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 29, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN—
Sep 29, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Sep 21, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Sep 21, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Apr 4, 2005GPRAPRIORITY ACTION E-MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 4, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Apr 1, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 15, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Jan 15, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jan 11, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Jan 11, 2005AMPXPRELIMINARY/VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT - ENTERED—
Jan 11, 2005PARITEAS VOLUNTARY AMENDMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance