USPTO serial 78517679
GUARANTEE RECORDS MANAGEMENT
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- HARDY LUDLOW, TARAH KIM
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with GUARANTEE RECORDS MANAGEMENT?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Michael Slapo
Michael Slapo Fox Rothschild LLP100 Park Avesuite 1500New York, NY 10017Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 006 | Metal containers for storage and transportation of goods, including business, personal and archival records, blueprints, electromagnetic and digital media namely, computer disks, computer tapes, audio tapes and cassettes, video tapes and cassette, optical disks, master recordings, films, microfilms and microfiche films, and medical records and X-rays | ACTIVE | — |
| 016 | Paper, cardboard and paperboard folders and boxes for storage of business, personal and archival records, blueprints and drawings, electromagnetic and digital media in the nature of computer disks, computer tapes, audio tapes and cassettes, video tapes and cassettes, optical disks, master recordings, films, microfilms and microfiche films, and medical records and x rays; bar code labels for folders and boxes | ACTIVE | — |
| 020 | Plastic containers for storage and transportation of goods, including business, personal and archival records, blueprints, electromagnetic and digital media namely, computer disks, computer tapes, audio tapes and cassettes, video tapes and cassettes, optical disks, master recordings, films, microfilms and microfiche films, and medical records and X-rays | ACTIVE | — |
| 040 | Electronic imaging, scanning and digitizing of paper records and documents; shredding and destruction services for paper records and documents | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | Providing use of on-line non-downloadable software via a global computer network for use in connection with management of documents, business records, blueprints and drawings, medical records and x-rays, electromagnetic and digital media in the nature of computer disks, computer tapes, audio tapes and cassettes, video tapes and cassettes, optical disks, master recordings, films, microfilms and microfiches films; hosting of scanned documents and records on secure web-hosted site; data transfer services and physical conversion services from paper records and documents to optical, digital, and magnetic media | ACTIVE | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by GRM Information Management Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by GRM Information Management Systems Inc.
- Other trademarks in Class 006
- Other trademarks in Class 016
- Other trademarks in Class 020
- Other trademarks in Class 040
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named GUARANTEE RECORDS MANAGEMENT
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 30, 2008 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Feb 13, 2008 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 24, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Aug 28, 2007 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 11, 2007 | NEWN | NEW NOA TO ISSUE | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PETG | PETITION TO REVIVE-GRANTED | — |
| May 22, 2007 | PROA | TEAS PETITION TO REVIVE RECEIVED | — |
| May 8, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 8, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| Mar 5, 2007 | IUCN | NOTICE OF ALLOWANCE CANCELLED | — |
| Feb 6, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 5, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jul 21, 2006 | ETOP | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE PROCESS - TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 6, 2006 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 7, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Feb 15, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Jan 24, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Jan 20, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | GNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT E-MAILED | — |
| Jan 11, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Dec 28, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 16, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 16, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 13, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 2, 2005 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |