Drawing for FOREVER DIAMONDS

USPTO serial 78517825

FOREVER DIAMONDS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
VOHRA, SANJEEV KUMAR
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 110 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with FOREVER DIAMONDS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Joel D. Voelzke

JOEL D VOELZKE INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW OFFICE OF JOEL400 CORPORATE POINTE, STE 300CULVER CITY, CA 90230UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
018Leather straps; leather bags; suitcases and wallets; leather pursesACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Oct 26, 2006MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT
Oct 26, 2006ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED
Oct 2, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Sep 29, 2006LOAPLETTER OF ABANDONMENT PROCESSED
Sep 29, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Sep 29, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Aug 22, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 24, 2006CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 24, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 10, 2006CHANAPPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED
Jul 10, 2006COARTEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED
Feb 28, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Feb 27, 2006CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jan 30, 2006ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Dec 30, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Dec 30, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance