USPTO serial 78517917
CMC FLUIDIQS
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Status 606
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WHITE, RICHARD F
- Law office
- INTENT TO USE SECTION
What this means
This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.
Need help with CMC FLUIDIQS?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
Matthew C. Lapple
April Wurster Paul, Hastings, Janofsky & Walker LLPP.O. Box 919092San Diego, CA 92191-9092UNITED STATESGoods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | (Based on Intent to Use) Collection, preparation, composition, storage, processing, acquisition and provision of business information, data, statistics and indices | ACTIVE | — |
| 037 | (Based on Intent to Use) Installation of computer networks; installation of electronic communications and computer systems; installation of instrumentation, control equipment and computer networks; maintenance services regarding computer hardware | ACTIVE | — |
| 042 | (Based on Use in Commerce) Systems integration, engineering and consulting services pertaining to information technology systems, automation, manufacturing, processing control systems for manufacturing processing facilities and municipal industrial, and other water and waste treatment distribution, and other plants and facilities namely, providing services namely, engineering services, integration of computer networks and field services pertaining to information technology systems and computer software maintenance; computer software maintenance services; consulting services regarding computer software; computer software programming for others; integration of computers and control equipment; computer network design for others; installation of computer software; technical support, namely, providing back-up computer programs and facilities in plants; technical support, namely, troubleshooting of computer hardware and software problems; technical support, namely, troubleshooting of industrial process control computer software problems; technical support, namely, monitoring of network systems; design of electronic communications and computer systems for others; data automation and collection service using proprietary software to evaluate, analyze and collect service data and monitoring the computer systems of others for technical purposes | ACTIVE | Sep 1, 2004 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Control Manufacturing Corporation
- Other trademarks owned by CONTROL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by CONTROL MANUFACTURING CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named CMC FLUIDIQS
- Prosecution event MAB6 explained
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| May 29, 2007 | MAB6 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 29, 2007 | ABN6 | ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILED | The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window. |
| May 15, 2007 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jun 27, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jun 7, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| May 5, 2006 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| May 3, 2006 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Apr 26, 2006 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Apr 17, 2006 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | IUAA | USE AMENDMENT ACCEPTED | — |
| Mar 15, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Mar 13, 2006 | FAXX | FAX RECEIVED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | XAEC | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED | — |
| Feb 17, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED | — |
| Feb 16, 2006 | CNEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN | — |
| Feb 7, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Feb 6, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 18, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 22, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 21, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| May 12, 2005 | AUPC | AMENDMENT TO USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| May 9, 2005 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| May 9, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Nov 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |