USPTO serial 78517990
DUNDEE WEALTH BANK
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3933705Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Mar 22, 2011
- Examiner
- OKEKE, BENJAMIN
- Law office
- PUBLICATION AND ISSUE SECTION
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with DUNDEE WEALTH BANK?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Toronto, Ontrario M5H 4A9, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Toronto, Ontario, CA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
MIDGE M HYMAN
MIDGE M. HYMAN COWAN, LIEBOWITZ & LATMAN, P.C.114 West 47th StreetNEW YORK, NY 10036-1525UNITED STATESGoods and services
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Dundee Bancorp Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks owned by DUNDEE CORPORATION
- Other trademarks in Class 009
- Other trademarks in Class 036
- Similar marks named DUNDEE WEALTH BANK
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 27, 2017 | C8.. | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (6-YR) | — |
| Mar 31, 2016 | TCCA | TEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 22, 2011 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Jan 4, 2011 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Dec 15, 2010 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 1, 2010 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Nov 26, 2010 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Oct 20, 2010 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Oct 18, 2010 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Apr 21, 2010 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 20, 2010 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Apr 1, 2010 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Oct 1, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 30, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Sep 16, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 15, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Aug 6, 2009 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jul 31, 2009 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 27, 2009 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jan 26, 2009 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 23, 2009 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jan 6, 2009 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jan 5, 2009 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Nov 4, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Nov 3, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Oct 28, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 7, 2008 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Apr 28, 2008 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Apr 25, 2008 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 2, 2008 | ERSI | TEAS RESPONSE TO SUSPENSION INQUIRY RECEIVED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jan 18, 2008 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Jan 9, 2008 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Jul 2, 2007 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Jun 29, 2007 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Jun 9, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| May 23, 2007 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Mar 29, 2007 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | CHAN | APPLICANT/CORRESPONDENCE CHANGES (NON-RESPONSIVE) ENTERED | — |
| Mar 28, 2007 | COAR | TEAS CHANGE OF OWNER ADDRESS RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Sep 19, 2006 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 7, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Aug 18, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| May 25, 2006 | CNSI | INQUIRY AS TO SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| May 24, 2006 | CNSI | SUSPENSION INQUIRY WRITTEN | — |
| Apr 24, 2006 | RCCK | SUSPENSION CHECKED - TO ATTORNEY FOR ACTION | — |
| Oct 6, 2005 | CNSL | LETTER OF SUSPENSION MAILED | — |
| Oct 5, 2005 | CNSL | SUSPENSION LETTER WRITTEN | — |
| Sep 29, 2005 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Sep 14, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| May 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 19, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 4, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 22, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |