CopyMark Law Group
4.9/5
Drawing for CARL BARKS

USPTO serial 78518068

CARL BARKS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
PINO, BRIAN
Law office
INTENT TO USE SECTION

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with CARL BARKS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Trademark Monitoring
(312) 319-4460
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Start a new application
(312) 319-4460

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Francie R. Gorowitz

Francie R. Gorowitz Katten Muchin Rosenman LLPSuite 26002029 Century Park EastLos Angeles, CA 90067

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
002Paint for artists, paints for arts and crafts and watercolor paintsACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
May 26, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
May 25, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Oct 17, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED—
Oct 16, 2008AITUCASE ASSIGNED TO INTENT TO USE PARALEGAL—
Oct 14, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED—
Oct 14, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 28, 2008EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED—
Apr 15, 2008EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED—
Apr 15, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 10, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED—
Oct 24, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED—
Oct 24, 2007FAXXFAX RECEIVED—
Oct 24, 2007EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED—
Apr 24, 2007EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED—
Apr 24, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Oct 11, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED—
Oct 11, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED—
Oct 11, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Apr 25, 2006NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Feb 15, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Jan 31, 2006PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Jan 11, 2006NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Dec 16, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Dec 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 10, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Nov 7, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Nov 4, 2005TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Oct 20, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Oct 20, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Aug 18, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Jul 14, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED—
Jun 28, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION MAILEDA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 28, 2005CPRAPRIORITY ACTION WRITTENA priority action is a type of Office Action the USPTO treats as time-sensitive. It usually means the examining attorney needs a specific response or amendment quickly — often relating to a foreign priority claim or a formal requirement. Respond within the stated deadline.
Jun 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Mar 24, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Feb 16, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Nov 22, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance