USPTO serial 78518558
FRONTIER
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- —
- Examiner
- WATSON, JULIE A
- Law office
- TTAB
What this means
These status codes mean the trademark application is abandoned and no longer pending. Common reasons include missing an Office Action response (600), filing without a valid basis (602), express abandonment by the applicant (604), or failure to respond to an examiner's inquiry (618). Revival may be possible in limited circumstances. If abandonment was unintentional, consult counsel about a petition to revive. Otherwise file a new application if protection is still needed.
Need help with FRONTIER?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
H. Roy Berkenstock
Frontier Clinical Research , LLC Arpana Rawtani910 Madison AvenueSuite 704Memphis, TN 38103Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 042 | Medical research, namely, conducting and coordinating clinical trials for the evaluation of safety and efficacy of pharmaceuticals, therapeutics, and medical devices; and consultation services rendered in connection therewith | ABANDONED | — |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 24, 2010 | MAB4 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | ABN4 | ABANDONMENT - AFTER INTER PARTES DECISION | — |
| Feb 24, 2010 | OP.T | OPPOSITION TERMINATED NO. 999999 | — |
| Dec 8, 2009 | OP.D | OPPOSITION DISMISSED NO. 999999 | — |
| Nov 17, 2009 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Jul 17, 2008 | OP.I | OPPOSITION INSTITUTED NO. 999999 | — |
| May 30, 2008 | ETOF | EXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED | — |
| May 20, 2008 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Apr 30, 2008 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Apr 14, 2008 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Apr 3, 2008 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Mar 31, 2008 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Dec 12, 2006 | EXPI | EX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | PGTT | PETITION GRANTED - TTAB APPEAL FILED | — |
| Nov 28, 2006 | APET | ASSIGNED TO PETITION STAFF | — |
| Nov 4, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Nov 2, 2006 | EXPT | EXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED | — |
| Oct 25, 2006 | EXAF | EXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PETR | PETITION TO REVIVE-RECEIVED | — |
| Oct 16, 2006 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Aug 23, 2006 | MAB2 | ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - FAILURE TO RESPOND | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Aug 23, 2006 | ABN2 | ABANDONMENT - FAILURE TO RESPOND OR LATE RESPONSE | The trademark application was abandoned because a required response or document was not filed by the deadline — usually a missed Office Action response. The application is dead unless a petition to revive is granted within a limited time. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL MAILED | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 25, 2006 | CNFR | FINAL REFUSAL WRITTEN | A final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon. |
| Jan 3, 2006 | ACEC | AMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Dec 19, 2005 | PAPER RECEIVED | — | |
| Jun 23, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| Jun 22, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |