USPTO serial 78518719
PROVADO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group
Reg. 3298872Status 710
- Filing date
- Status date
- Registration date
- Sep 25, 2007
- Examiner
- MAHMOUDI, MARIAM AZIZ
- Law office
- TMO LAW OFFICE 112
What this means
Status 710 means the registration was cancelled because a required Section 8 declaration of continued use was not filed within the deadline (including any grace period). The federal registration is no longer active. Evaluate filing a new application if you still use the mark, or petition if cancellation was erroneous. Consult counsel on remaining common-law rights.
Need help with PROVADO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC?
If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.
Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.
Owner
Gainesville, FL
Gainesville, FL
Gainesville, FL
Jacksonville, FL
ATLANTA, GA
Attorney of record
The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.
John B. Farmer
John B. Farmer Leading-Edge Law Group, PLC4905 Dickens RoadSuite 100Richmond, VA 23221Goods and services
| Class | Description | Status | First use |
|---|---|---|---|
| 035 | Value-added reseller services, namely, distributorship services in the field of telecommunications hardware and software | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2005 |
| 037 | Custom installation of telecommunications and computer network cabling; maintenance and repair of telecommunication systems; maintenance of voicemail systems, namely, making moves, adds, and changes to voicemail systems | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2005 |
| 042 | Design and implementation of telecommunication systems, namely, voice over IP systems, call center systems, voice and unified messaging systems, [video conferencing systems,] audio and multimedia conferencing systems, and call recording systems; custom design of telecommunications and computer network cabling [; Computer consulting services; Computer software development and computer software consultation; Computer software development and computer software consultation in the fields of business management, logistics, call-taking, reservations processing, routing, dispatching, and billing] | SECTION 8 - CANCELLED | Apr 29, 2005 |
Related trademarks
CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.
- Other trademarks owned by Provado Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Provado Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by Provado Technologies, Inc.
- Other trademarks owned by PROVADO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Other trademarks owned by LOGISTICARE SOLUTIONS, LLC
- Other trademarks in Class 035
- Other trademarks in Class 037
- Other trademarks in Class 042
- Similar marks named PROVADO TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
- Recently changed USPTO trademarks
- Recently filed trademarks
- Browse all trademark records
Prosecution history
| Date | Code | Event | What it means |
|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 27, 2018 | CAEX | CANCELLED SEC. 8 (10-YR)/EXPIRED SECTION 9 | — |
| Jan 31, 2018 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Sep 25, 2016 | REM2 | COURTESY REMINDER - SEC. 8 (10-YR)/SEC. 9 E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 28, 2013 | NA85 | NOTICE OF ACCEPTANCE OF SEC. 8 & 15 - E-MAILED | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | C15A | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) ACCEPTED & SEC. 15 ACK. | — |
| Sep 27, 2013 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | 815F | REGISTERED - SEC. 8 (6-YR) & SEC. 15 FILED | — |
| Sep 24, 2013 | E815 | TEAS SECTION 8 & 15 RECEIVED | — |
| Jul 28, 2011 | A7OK | AMENDMENT UNDER SECTION 7 - PROCESSED | — |
| Jul 21, 2011 | APRE | CASE ASSIGNED TO POST REGISTRATION PARALEGAL | — |
| Jul 14, 2011 | ES7R | TEAS SECTION 7 REQUEST RECEIVED | — |
| Mar 30, 2011 | ASCK | ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP NOT UPDATED AUTOMATICALLY | — |
| Mar 23, 2011 | ASGN | AUTOMATIC UPDATE OF ASSIGNMENT OF OWNERSHIP | — |
| Mar 15, 2011 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Mar 15, 2011 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 25, 2007 | R.PR | REGISTERED-PRINCIPAL REGISTER | Your trademark is registered on the Principal Register — the strongest form of federal trademark protection. You may use the ® symbol for the covered goods and services. Maintenance filings (Section 8 and renewals) are required to keep the registration alive. |
| Aug 21, 2007 | REGV | LAW OFFICE REGISTRATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Aug 21, 2007 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Jul 9, 2007 | CNPR | ALLOWED PRINCIPAL REGISTER - SOU ACCEPTED | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | SUPC | STATEMENT OF USE PROCESSING COMPLETE | — |
| Jul 5, 2007 | EX2G | SOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | IUAF | USE AMENDMENT FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EXT2 | SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED | — |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Mar 30, 2007 | EISU | TEAS STATEMENT OF USE RECEIVED | The applicant filed a Statement of Use with specimens showing the mark in actual commerce. The USPTO will review the filing for compliance. If accepted, the mark can proceed to registration; if deficient, the USPTO may issue a requirement or office action. |
| Oct 24, 2006 | EX1G | SOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED | — |
| Oct 23, 2006 | ARAA | ATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 23, 2006 | REAP | TEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EXT1 | SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED | — |
| Sep 22, 2006 | EEXT | SOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVED | The applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use. |
| Apr 25, 2006 | NOAM | NOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANT | A Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date. |
| Jan 31, 2006 | PUBO | PUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITION | Your mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance. |
| Jan 11, 2006 | NPUB | NOTICE OF PUBLICATION | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | PREV | LAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED | — |
| Dec 15, 2005 | ALIE | ASSIGNED TO LIE | — |
| Dec 6, 2005 | CNSA | APPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER | — |
| Dec 2, 2005 | TEME | TEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | CRFA | CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE | — |
| Nov 7, 2005 | TROA | TEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVED | This event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action. |
| Oct 31, 2005 | GEAP | EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION E-MAILED | — |
| Oct 31, 2005 | CPEA | EXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED | — |
| May 20, 2005 | GNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILED | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 20, 2005 | CNRT | NON-FINAL ACTION WRITTEN | A non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application. |
| May 17, 2005 | DOCK | ASSIGNED TO EXAMINER | — |
| Nov 23, 2004 | NWAP | NEW APPLICATION ENTERED | — |