Drawing for POPPIES MEESTER BAKKER POPELIER MAITRE PATISSIER

USPTO serial 78519947

POPPIES MEESTER BAKKER POPELIER MAITRE PATISSIER

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 603
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
MITTLER, ROBIN M
Law office
LAW OFFICE 117 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with POPPIES MEESTER BAKKER POPELIER MAITRE PATISSIER?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Eric H. Weimers

Mark P. Vrla Jenner & Block LLP330 N. Wabash AvenueChicago, IL 60611-7603UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
030Bakery goods, pastries, cookies, cakes, biscuits, eclairs, cream puffs, donuts, waffles, frozen desserts and confectionsACTIVEAug 31, 1990

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Apr 23, 2008MAB3ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Apr 22, 2008EXPTEXPARTE APPEAL TERMINATED—
Feb 7, 2008ABN3ABANDONMENT - AFTER EX PARTE APPEAL—
Feb 7, 2008EXPAEX PARTE APPEAL-REFUSAL AFFIRMED—
Sep 14, 2007GNSNNOTIFICATION OF EXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2007GNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT E-MAILED—
Sep 14, 2007CNESEXAMINERS STATEMENT - COMPLETED—
Jul 16, 2007JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jun 4, 2007TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Dec 21, 2006GECDACTION DENYING REQ FOR RECON E-MAILED—
Dec 21, 2006CNCFACTION CONTINUING FINAL - COMPLETED—
Oct 11, 2006DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Sep 18, 2006JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Jul 13, 2006EXPIEX PARTE APPEAL-INSTITUTED—
Jul 13, 2006EXAFEXPARTE APPEAL RECEIVED AT TTAB—
Jan 13, 2006GNFRFINAL REFUSAL E-MAILEDA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 13, 2006CNFRFINAL REFUSAL WRITTENA final Office Action (final refusal) means the examining attorney is maintaining at least one refusal and your options are narrower. You can file a response addressing the refusal, appeal to the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board, or let the application abandon.
Jan 6, 2006TEMETEAS/EMAIL CORRESPONDENCE ENTERED—
Dec 29, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE—
Dec 29, 2005TROATEAS RESPONSE TO OFFICE ACTION RECEIVEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Jun 29, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 29, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
May 19, 2005TCCATEAS CHANGE OF CORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED—
Nov 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance