Drawing for MASTERFOODS

USPTO serial 78519985

MASTERFOODS

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 606
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
Examiner
BELLO, ZACK
Law office
TMO LAW OFFICE 111

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with MASTERFOODS?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Cristina A. Carvalho

Cristina A. Carvalho Arent Fox LLP1050 CONNECTICUT AVENUE, NWWASHINGTON, DC 20036-5339UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
029Prepared entrees consisting primarily of meat together with vegetables and/or sauce and/or seasoningACTIVE
030Prepared entrees consisting primarily of rice or pasta together with rice, rice mixes, vegetables and/or sauce and/or seasoningACTIVE

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

Latest event (MAB6): The intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Jan 21, 2009MAB6ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Jan 19, 2009ABN6ABANDONMENT - NO USE STATEMENT FILEDThe intent-to-use application was abandoned because no acceptable Statement of Use (or valid extension) was filed before the Notice of Allowance deadline expired. The application is dead unless revived within a limited window.
Feb 19, 2008EX5GSOU EXTENSION 5 GRANTED
Feb 19, 2008EXT5SOU EXTENSION 5 FILED
Feb 19, 2008EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Nov 9, 2007EX4GSOU EXTENSION 4 GRANTED
Nov 9, 2007EXT4SOU EXTENSION 4 FILED
Nov 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Jun 18, 2007EX3GSOU EXTENSION 3 GRANTED
Mar 9, 2007EXT3SOU EXTENSION 3 FILED
Mar 9, 2007EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 19, 2006EX2GSOU EXTENSION 2 GRANTED
Nov 3, 2006EXT2SOU EXTENSION 2 FILED
Nov 3, 2006ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Nov 3, 2006REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED
Nov 3, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Aug 14, 2006DPCCDIVISIONAL PROCESSING COMPLETE
Jul 26, 2006DRRRDIVISIONAL REQUEST RECEIVED
Jul 26, 2006MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jul 6, 2006EX1GSOU EXTENSION 1 GRANTED
Jun 15, 2006EXT1SOU EXTENSION 1 FILED
Jun 15, 2006EEXTSOU TEAS EXTENSION RECEIVEDThe applicant requested more time to file a Statement of Use before the Notice of Allowance deadline. Each extension typically adds six months. A limited number of extensions are available for intent-to-use applications not yet in use.
Dec 20, 2005NOAMNOA MAILED - SOU REQUIRED FROM APPLICANTA Notice of Allowance means your intent-to-use application cleared examination and opposition but is not registered yet. You must file a Statement of Use showing the mark in commerce, or request an extension, before the deadline — usually six months from the notice date.
Sep 27, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 7, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION
Aug 18, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED
Aug 12, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE
Aug 9, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER
Aug 9, 2005XAECEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT ENTERED
Aug 8, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT MAILED
Aug 5, 2005CNEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT -WRITTEN
Aug 5, 2005ACECAMENDMENT FROM APPLICANT ENTERED
Jul 27, 2005CRFACORRESPONDENCE RECEIVED IN LAW OFFICE
Jul 27, 2005MAILPAPER RECEIVED
Jun 23, 2005CEPECOMBINED EXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION ENTERED
Jun 22, 2005CEAPEXAMINER'S AMENDMENT/PRIORITY ACTION MAILED
Jun 22, 2005CPEAEXAMINERS AMENDMENT AND/OR PRIORITY ACTION - COMPLETED
Jun 21, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER
Nov 29, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance