Drawing for GREEN LEAF SPA

USPTO serial 78520171

GREEN LEAF SPA

Reviewed by CopyMark Law Group

Status 601
Filing date
Status date
Registration date
—
Examiner
ABRAMS, JACQUELINE WILLETTE
Law office
TMEG LAW OFFICE 101 - EXAMINING ATTORNEY ASSIGNED

What this means

This page summarizes the public USPTO record for this serial number, including owners, goods and services, and prosecution history.

Need help with GREEN LEAF SPA?

If you own this trademark, we can monitor new filings and help with USPTO deadlines. If you do not, we can file a new U.S. application.

Current trademark owner
Monitor this mark, or talk with CopyMark about this registration.
Not the owner?
File a new U.S. trademark application, or speak with our attorneys.

Owner

Attorney of record

The USPTO lists this attorney as the applicant's representative for correspondence on this application.

Robert M. Schwartz, Esq.

ROBERT M SCHWARTZ ESQ ROBERT M SCHWARTZ PA2445 HOLLYWOOD BLVDHOLLYWOOD, FL 33020UNITED STATES

Goods and services

ClassDescriptionStatusFirst use
003SKIN CARE PRODUCTS, NAMELY, FACE CREAM, BODY CREAM, NON-MEDICATED ANTI-WRINKLE CREAM, NON-MEDICATED SKIN RENEWAL CREAM; EYE SERUM; FACIAL SERUM; BODY LOTION; BODY OIL; BATH OIL, FACIAL TONER, BODY TONER, FACIAL SOAP, BODY SOAP, BODY WASH, FOAM BATH, BATH SOAK, BODY SHOWER GEL, FACIAL CLEANSING CREAM, FACIAL CLEANSING LOTION, FACIAL MASQUE, BODY MASQUE AND FOOT MASQUE; FOOT CREAMS, FOOT SCRUBS, FOOT BALM, ANTI-CELLULITE LOTIONS, CREAMS AND GELS, SHAMPOOS AND CONDITIONERSACTIVE—

Related trademarks

CopyMark links this record to cited §2(d) serials, the owner's other marks, Nice classes, similar mark names, and recently changed USPTO applications.

Prosecution history

DateCodeEventWhat it means
Nov 25, 2005MAB1ABANDONMENT NOTICE MAILED - EXPRESS ABANDONMENT—
Nov 24, 2005ABN1ABANDONMENT - EXPRESS MAILED—
Nov 23, 2005EXARTEAS EXPRESS ABANDONMENT RECEIVED—
Nov 23, 2005GNRTNON-FINAL ACTION E-MAILEDA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2005CNRTNON-FINAL ACTION WRITTENA non-final Office Action means the USPTO examining attorney has raised at least one issue with your trademark application but has not made a final decision. You usually have three months to respond with arguments, amendments, or evidence. Missing the deadline can abandon the application.
Nov 23, 2005ZZZXPREVIOUS ALLOWANCE COUNT WITHDRAWN—
Nov 18, 2005JURTJURISDICTION RESTORED TO EXAMINING ATTORNEY—
Nov 4, 2005ETOFEXTENSION OF TIME TO OPPOSE RECEIVED—
Oct 11, 2005PUBOPUBLISHED FOR OPPOSITIONYour mark was published in the USPTO Official Gazette for a 30-day opposition window. During that period, third parties who believe they would be harmed can file an opposition. If no opposition is filed, prosecution usually continues toward registration or a Notice of Allowance.
Sep 21, 2005NPUBNOTICE OF PUBLICATION—
Jul 6, 2005PREVLAW OFFICE PUBLICATION REVIEW COMPLETED—
Jul 1, 2005ALIEASSIGNED TO LIE—
Jun 27, 2005CNSAAPPROVED FOR PUB - PRINCIPAL REGISTER—
Jun 24, 2005DOCKASSIGNED TO EXAMINER—
Feb 9, 2005ARAAATTORNEY/DOM.REP.REVOKED AND/OR APPOINTEDThis event means the applicant filed a response to a USPTO Office Action — typically arguments, amendments, or evidence addressing the examiner's objections. The USPTO will review the response and either allow the mark to proceed or issue another action.
Feb 9, 2005REAPTEAS REVOKE/APP/CHANGE ADDR OF ATTY/DOM REP RECEIVED—
Nov 30, 2004NWAPNEW APPLICATION ENTERED—

Frequently asked questions

Related guidance